” The Mk IV Is Different From The C Model…”

” But only in the under-flange. This is 13mm longer than the 1943 modification. Few modellers realise this.”

Not surprising, Chief. 13mm in 1/72nd scale is .18 of a millimetre and very few modellers can see that small – or care that much. We are struggling to get parts off a sprue without digging holes in them – measurements under a millimetre are the stuff of fantasy.

I read a lot of forums – Australian, European, and North American. I watch a lot of YouTube modellers. And I marvel at the ability of the British to wind themselves into knots about trivia – especially 75-year-old measurements and paint colours.

I admire precision in modelling. I admire it in science, and sometimes in art. But what we make from plastic model kits is ever more decorated toys…and we would do well to realise it. We are not making standard works of reference for the edification of mankind into the 24th century. We are making toys for ourselves. If our toys are 3 mm too long in one dimension and 2mm short in another, it will not affect their beauty nor our pride in assembling them well.

Likewise the debates about colour and surface. I’ve been to the RAAF museum at Point Cook and can testify from direct observation that there are surfaces of very kind, from glass-smooth to cobblestone – the latter on the toilet seats. You cannot nail down anything past probability and in some cases you can’t go closer than possibility. And that’s over 75 years – the people who build medieval four-engine bombers have it even worse.

You need not be perfect. This is no excuse for being lousy, but there is a wide space for acceptable performance between the two extremes.

4 responses to “” The Mk IV Is Different From The C Model…””

  1. Are those two yellow painted cement blocks the real-world equivalent of the hammered musket ball keeping the nose down?

    Like

    1. Wayne,

      I think they are the RAAF’s solution to plane jacking. Actually, the overall appearance of the thing would put most burglars and a fair few sewage farm workers off. It is perhaps the most vile museum exhibit of an aircraft that I’ve yet seen.

      There must be a reason for it. There is always a reason. Someone, somewhere, thought it was a good thing to do. We just hope they are not in charge of any other aircraft…

      Like

      1. But still a useful prototypical example for having silver frost all over the windows. I had many like that as a callow youth.

        Like

  2. I agree completely about the usefulness (or lack thereof, to me) of such precision in kits, but I don’t tend to care if others are into it, as long as they don’t criticize me for the converse. I say that whatever brings us each satisfaction in our hobby is just fine. (It also occurs to me from time to time that not too long ago we each enjoyed our hobby directions in near isolation. Before I started thinking it might be kind of fun to have a blog, VERY FEW people ever saw my work — even calling it “work” seems overly pretentious — and it didn’t even occur to me to care or compare. I do like seeing other people’s collections and reading their perspectives, though; apparently many of us do…)

    Like

Leave a reply to christopherpflueger Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.